Gender-specific conception of attention

There appears to be a rather striking difference in the conception of "attention" between genders. In fact, I daresay that the female understanding of "attention" is, once again, fallacious. My argument is persuasive as it's developed system-intrinsically, in other words, I thought it through by emphatising women in particular situations which men are confronted with way too often: bitching.
First things first however: What is attention? The term involves two different sub-concepts, I reckon. On the one hand, there's natural attention for things that appear interesting to us. Therefore, it's interest that steers our attention. Such kind of attention can be lost again, though. Things aren't interesting all the time. On the other hand, there's the normative attention, that kind of attention we're required to pay - for safety and security. Women tend to mix up these two ideas. Or let's simply ask: What makes a woman gain the attention of a man? There might be a slight chance - or rather a first, small significance - for looks. Generally and to the most extent, however, it's rather about the stuff he's doing and the thing he's talking about. This is the reason why the concept of status and prestige goes so perfectly along with the amount and extent of women a man can get: Women are attentive for achievements and skills. Of course, such status and prestige isn't constant. Men aren't interesting all the time and therefore lose attention again. The male gender is used to have learn this bitter lesson for millenia already.
When women come to themselves, however, they suddenly apply completely different standards: It's not about what they do and say, but how they appear. In short, it's all about appeareance, not what you are, but how you have been created. Anyway, this goes still perfectly along with the concept. Looks aren't permanent, either. Even the most beautiful girl doesn't only get old, but boring to look at much quicker than she ages. Everyone gets fuckin' bored about a picasso after watching it for some time - and even Picasso got fuckin' bored of his perfect paintings he drew in early years.
However, due to the fact that female attention isn't gained by achievements and skills, they never had to do much for it and end up thinking of it as a state of being! That's the first big fallacy! They think that they're simple existence is cause for attention. And whenever a man loses interest in a woman's appearance, she feel rejected and without any attention. Not leaving to that, they step further and mix up the two concepts of attention and further allege men of being careless! That's the second big fallacy. That the whole case isn't about this second type of attention, anyway, shows the very reaction of the woman herself: In fact, her allegations are nothing else but a final, ignorant and desperate approach to raise attention: bitching. There might be the general tendency that the more attention a woman can gain with her appereance the more ignorant she is to the whole process and the less alternatives she has to "deliver" than the oh so natural bitching.
Of course, bitching itself is the most illogical, retarded act of communication known to man. Basically, it's a woman searching for every slightest option and reason to make allegations to her man. Hell, they might start digging up your whole past 'cause that's the only thing they could come up with. Don't ask them what their point is about. They first have to stop talking to realize that they're only doing it to gain attention - which apparently doesn't work and therefore wouldn't have started in the first place. Self-reflection, my dear friends, cannot be forced upon.
However, modern technologies seem to have given a very powerful tool to men and their suffering: To the extent that women have to write down their bitching and that stuff actually get protocolled, they are confronted with their loose, illogical babble first when they are actually writing it down, second when the man has the opportunity to answer and point out the fallacies in the argumentation without being interrupted all the time and third, when checking the protocolls. Oh, how I am looking forward to the day of complete state control when I can ask the woman to look up "conversation protocoll, file 4.21, day 19.03.2009" to see that I've already admitted, asserted and analyzed a certain mistake of mine - or that it wasn't my mistake in the first place. Efficiency in partner conversation appears to have a very bright future.
Back to the concept of attention. In short, there aren't only different types of attention, different ways genders cause it, but in woman's case, they apply different types of standards to attention: While men naturally get and deserve it only when they deliver, they claim it for themselves as some state of being.